I feel better than others and quickly grasp subtle nuances when comparing deals for their profitability.

Type discrimination

0.115 bits

Mean agreement

52%

Types

Highest:
LIE+90%
Lowest:
SEI+23%
ILE
+49%
ESE
+36%
SEI
+23%
LII
+45%
EIE
+39%
SLE
+60%
LSI
+59%
IEI
+28%
SEE
+71%
LIE
+90%
ILI
+84%
ESI
+38%
LSE
+76%
IEE
+40%
EII
+41%
SLI
+49%

Functions

Strongest:
Te+3.86
Weakest:
Fe-2.91
Ni
+0.78
Ne
-0.90
Si
-1.45
Se
+1.17
Ti
+0.17
Te
+3.86
Fi
-0.73
Fe
-2.91
Qi
-0.25
Qe
-0.36
Di
-0.37
De
+1.24

Quadras

α
-0.70
β
-0.27
γ
+0.99
δ
-0.01

Clubs

NT
+0.80
ST
+0.48
NF
-0.77
SF
-0.51

Big 5

O
-0.17
C
+0.33
E
+0.23
A
-0.51
N
-0.48
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Thinking0.64
Second:
Transactionalism0.49

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Form of Action:
Utility Optimizer

13

1.20
2

Actualization Style:
Competing

14

1.12
3

Quadra:
Gamma

20

0.99

1

Actualization Style:
Supporting

14

-0.87
2

Interpersonal Style:
Tender-Hearted

2

-1.00
3

Form of Action:
Emotion Broadcaster

13

-1.06

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

-0.1345th pct

Superspectra

EmD
-1.27
Psy
+0.45
Ext
+0.67

Spectra

Somatoform
-1.26
Internalizing
-1.25
Thought Disorder
-0.64
Detachment
+1.03
Disinhibited Ext.
-0.21
Antagonistic Ext.
+1.21

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections