I always consider my work in terms of what criticisms could be made of it.

Type discrimination

0.030 bits

Mean agreement

61%

Types

Highest:
ILI+77%
Lowest:
SEE+42%
ILE
+52%
ESE
+58%
SEI
+49%
LII
+66%
EIE
+63%
SLE
+58%
LSI
+71%
IEI
+50%
SEE
+42%
LIE
+73%
ILI
+77%
ESI
+67%
LSE
+69%
IEE
+58%
EII
+69%
SLI
+49%

Functions

Strongest:
Te+2.65
Weakest:
Si-2.21
Ni
+0.67
Ne
-0.88
Si
-2.21
Se
-1.41
Ti
+1.50
Te
+2.65
Fi
+0.67
Fe
-0.99
Qi
-0.33
Qe
-0.47
Di
+1.86
De
+1.50

Quadras

α
-0.45
β
-0.02
γ
+0.41
δ
+0.06

Clubs

NT
+0.64
ST
+0.11
NF
-0.07
SF
-0.68

Big 5

O
-0.25
C
+0.49
E
-0.27
A
-0.12
N
-0.07
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Judging0.64
Second:
Thinking0.37

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Reasoning Style:
Constructor

12

0.92
2

Actualization Style:
Competing

14

0.92
3

Existential Role:
Householder

16

0.89

1

Operational Style:
Freewheeling

15

-0.88
2

Reasoning Style:
Diplomat

12

-1.10
3

Perceptual Style:
Visceral

9

-1.13

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

-0.3937th pct

Superspectra

EmD
+0.38
Psy
+0.46
Ext
-1.23

Spectra

Somatoform
+0.06
Internalizing
+0.57
Thought Disorder
-0.10
Detachment
+0.67
Disinhibited Ext.
-1.96
Antagonistic Ext.
-0.18

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections