I usually think through and plan not just one, but several different alternatives for how a situation might develop.

Type discrimination

0.062 bits

Mean agreement

69%

Types

Highest:
LIE+94%
Lowest:
SEI+45%
ILE
+77%
ESE
+62%
SEI
+45%
LII
+76%
EIE
+81%
SLE
+61%
LSI
+61%
IEI
+54%
SEE
+66%
LIE
+94%
ILI
+80%
ESI
+58%
LSE
+87%
IEE
+80%
EII
+72%
SLI
+55%

Functions

Strongest:
Te+3.18
Weakest:
Si-2.71
Ni
+0.72
Ne
+1.64
Si
-2.71
Se
-1.73
Ti
-0.05
Te
+3.18
Fi
+0.01
Fe
-1.05
Qi
-0.11
Qe
+0.78
Di
-0.28
De
+1.00

Quadras

α
-0.33
β
-0.39
γ
+0.40
δ
+0.32

Clubs

NT
+0.95
ST
-0.25
NF
+0.19
SF
-0.88

Big 5

O
+0.21
C
+0.21
E
+0.24
A
-0.14
N
-0.09
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Intuiting0.57
Second:
Extraversion0.51

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Immersed in:
Ideational Velocity

1

1.04
2

Social Energy:
Connecting

6

0.95
3

Activity Orientation:
Researcher

8

0.95

1

Economic Role:
Consolidator

11

-0.92
2

Perceptual Style:
Visceral

9

-0.96
3

Immersed in:
Familiar Order

1

-1.11

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

-0.0249th pct

Superspectra

EmD
-0.26
Psy
+0.20
Ext
+0.06

Spectra

Somatoform
-0.14
Internalizing
-0.33
Thought Disorder
+0.41
Detachment
-0.03
Disinhibited Ext.
-0.23
Antagonistic Ext.
+0.29

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections