I can explain the essence of any phenomenon in a few sentences.

Type discrimination

0.066 bits

Mean agreement

69%

Types

Highest:
LII+92%
Lowest:
IEI+47%
ILE
+75%
ESE
+59%
SEI
+56%
LII
+92%
EIE
+66%
SLE
+83%
LSI
+77%
IEI
+47%
SEE
+66%
LIE
+75%
ILI
+80%
ESI
+65%
LSE
+90%
IEE
+49%
EII
+51%
SLI
+72%

Functions

Strongest:
Ti+2.93
Weakest:
Fi-2.38
Ni
-0.74
Ne
-0.82
Si
-0.24
Se
+0.50
Ti
+2.93
Te
+2.83
Fi
-2.38
Fe
-2.09
Qi
+1.22
Qe
+0.40
Di
-0.88
De
+0.12

Quadras

α
+0.12
β
-0.05
γ
+0.19
δ
-0.25

Clubs

NT
+0.85
ST
+0.85
NF
-1.16
SF
-0.55

Big 5

O
-0.36
C
+0.34
E
-0.09
A
-0.65
N
-0.28
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Thinking0.85
Second:
Negative0.27

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Argumentation Style:
Constructor

12

1.07
2

Actualization Style:
Creating

14

0.98
3

Form of Action:
System Structurer

13

0.94

1

Argumentation Style:
Diplomat

12

-1.06
2

Actualization Style:
Supporting

14

-1.12
3

Activity Orientation:
Mentalizer

8

-1.16

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

+0.0852th pct

Superspectra

EmD
-0.67
Psy
+0.62
Ext
+0.25

Spectra

Somatoform
-0.71
Internalizing
-0.63
Thought Disorder
-0.76
Detachment
+1.34
Disinhibited Ext.
-0.62
Antagonistic Ext.
+0.93

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections