The solutions I propose are usually radical and stubborn.

Type discrimination

0.050 bits

Mean agreement

51%

Types

Highest:
SLE+77%
Lowest:
EII+25%
ILE
+62%
ESE
+55%
SEI
+41%
LII
+53%
EIE
+56%
SLE
+77%
LSI
+63%
IEI
+45%
SEE
+63%
LIE
+56%
ILI
+45%
ESI
+53%
LSE
+49%
IEE
+26%
EII
+25%
SLI
+44%

Functions

Strongest:
Se+3.07
Weakest:
Fi-2.71
Ni
-0.19
Ne
-2.14
Si
-0.94
Se
+3.07
Ti
+2.39
Te
+0.18
Fi
-2.71
Fe
+0.35
Qi
+0.98
Qe
+0.16
Di
-1.34
De
+0.33

Quadras

α
+0.15
β
+0.73
γ
+0.27
δ
-1.14

Clubs

NT
+0.25
ST
+0.57
NF
-0.99
SF
+0.17

Big 5

O
-0.08
C
+0.14
E
+0.42
A
-0.81
N
-0.34
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Antagonism0.50
Second:
Passionarism0.44

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Primal Role:
Aggressor

10

1.02
2

Form of Action:
System Structurer

13

1.00
3

Social Interaction:
Confrontational

5

0.94

1

Activity Orientation:
Mentalizer

8

-0.99
2

Actualization Style:
Supporting

14

-1.09
3

Quadra:
Delta

20

-1.14

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

+0.4564th pct

Superspectra

EmD
-1.14
Psy
+0.17
Ext
+1.54

Spectra

Somatoform
-1.33
Internalizing
-0.99
Thought Disorder
-0.49
Detachment
+0.56
Disinhibited Ext.
+0.67
Antagonistic Ext.
+1.76

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections