I find it very difficult to compromise in assessing what is good and what is bad, what is decent and worthy, and what is disgusting.

Type discrimination

0.034 bits

Mean agreement

58%

Types

Highest:
ESI+77%
Lowest:
IEI+41%
ILE
+74%
ESE
+56%
SEI
+45%
LII
+69%
EIE
+68%
SLE
+64%
LSI
+60%
IEI
+41%
SEE
+52%
LIE
+43%
ILI
+57%
ESI
+77%
LSE
+53%
IEE
+48%
EII
+52%
SLI
+65%

Functions

Strongest:
Qi+2.33
Weakest:
De-1.17
Ni
-0.99
Ne
-0.28
Si
-0.28
Se
+0.42
Ti
+2.07
Te
+0.12
Fi
-0.61
Fe
-0.45
Qi
+2.33
Qe
+0.66
Di
-1.06
De
-1.17

Quadras

α
+0.31
β
+0.05
γ
-0.05
δ
-0.31

Clubs

NT
+0.28
ST
+0.26
NF
-0.52
SF
-0.02

Big 5

O
-0.17
C
+0.13
E
-0.17
A
-0.36
N
+0.14
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Gravity0.60
Second:
Nonacceptance0.43

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Identity Orientation:
Individual Will

17

0.96
2

Form of Action:
System Structurer

13

0.85
3

Social Energy:
Igniting

6

0.73

1

Economic Role:
Negotiator

11

-0.73
2

Social Energy:
Connecting

6

-0.82
3

Reasoning Style:
Diplomat

12

-1.06

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

+0.8176th pct

Superspectra

EmD
+0.72
Psy
+0.75
Ext
-0.15

Spectra

Somatoform
+0.57
Internalizing
+0.79
Thought Disorder
+0.09
Detachment
+0.91
Disinhibited Ext.
-0.41
Antagonistic Ext.
+0.13

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections