In my reasoning, I always use large-block logic - guided by the overall meaning and ultimate goal of the arguments, and never get caught up in situational details.

Type discrimination

0.034 bits

Mean agreement

49%

Types

Highest:
LII+70%
Lowest:
ESE+31%
ILE
+59%
ESE
+31%
SEI
+45%
LII
+70%
EIE
+37%
SLE
+61%
LSI
+52%
IEI
+42%
SEE
+37%
LIE
+61%
ILI
+44%
ESI
+45%
LSE
+58%
IEE
+39%
EII
+43%
SLI
+58%

Functions

Strongest:
Ti+3.09
Weakest:
Fe-2.46
Ni
-0.46
Ne
+0.53
Si
+0.09
Se
-0.58
Ti
+3.09
Te
+2.14
Fi
-2.35
Fe
-2.46
Qi
+0.89
Qe
+0.29
Di
-0.22
De
-0.69

Quadras

α
+0.22
β
-0.08
γ
-0.20
δ
+0.06

Clubs

NT
+0.89
ST
+0.78
NF
-0.80
SF
-0.87

Big 5

O
-0.19
C
+0.07
E
-0.08
A
-0.07
N
-0.24
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Thinking0.84
Second:
Giving Over0.27

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Actualization Style:
Creating

14

1.15
2

Form of Action:
System Structurer

13

1.08
3

Argumentation Style:
Constructor

12

1.06

1

Argumentation Style:
Guardian

12

-0.92
2

Form of Action:
Emotion Broadcaster

13

-0.94
3

Communication Style:
Charismatic-Expressive

2

-1.20

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

-0.4335th pct

Superspectra

EmD
-0.90
Psy
+0.52
Ext
-0.14

Spectra

Somatoform
-1.04
Internalizing
-0.78
Thought Disorder
-0.54
Detachment
+1.04
Disinhibited Ext.
-0.16
Antagonistic Ext.
-0.08

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections