I am more in favor of moderate solutions than radical ones.

Type discrimination

0.101 bits

Mean agreement

61%

Types

Highest:
EII+85%
Lowest:
SLE+14%
ILE
+41%
ESE
+61%
SEI
+72%
LII
+66%
EIE
+39%
SLE
+14%
LSI
+60%
IEI
+54%
SEE
+45%
LIE
+73%
ILI
+73%
ESI
+64%
LSE
+78%
IEE
+63%
EII
+85%
SLI
+82%

Functions

Strongest:
Fi+2.18
Weakest:
Se-2.76
Ni
-0.74
Ne
+0.25
Si
+1.52
Se
-2.76
Ti
-0.99
Te
+1.93
Fi
+2.18
Fe
-1.41
Qi
+0.33
Qe
-0.43
Di
+0.58
De
+0.66

Quadras

α
-0.03
β
-1.05
γ
+0.17
δ
+0.91

Clubs

NT
+0.15
ST
-0.12
NF
-0.02
SF
-0.01

Big 5

O
-0.32
C
+0.17
E
-0.53
A
+0.75
N
+0.18
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Transactionalism0.54
Second:
Introversion0.49

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Quadra:
Delta

20

0.91
2

Form of Action:
Utility Optimizer

13

0.88
3

Social Interaction:
Peaceful

5

0.87

1

Quadra:
Beta

20

-1.05
2

Temperament:
Radial-Exploring

3

-1.11
3

Social Energy:
Igniting

6

-1.22

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

-1.3110th pct

Superspectra

EmD
+0.67
Psy
-0.41
Ext
-2.08

Spectra

Somatoform
+1.04
Internalizing
+0.43
Thought Disorder
-0.73
Detachment
-0.02
Disinhibited Ext.
-1.63
Antagonistic Ext.
-1.76

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections