IEI vs LII Compared by Markers

IEI vs LII Compared by Markers

Markers that IEI mostly agrees with, while LII mostly disagrees:

1. Strength, record, nobility, charity, vulnerability, and resentment - most of these words are more significant to me than concepts like calculation and awareness, justice and equality, outrage, hatred, and delight.2. I usually don't care about minor logical contradictions in facts.3. I have problems with focused mental reasoning.4. It's hard for me to resist temptation.5. If I had the opportunity, I would prefer to delegate all my bills and business papers to a reliable person, secretary, or lawyer.6. Often, obsessive and unnecessary images-associations interfere with my thought process, cluttering and complicating it.7. Strength, nobility, charity are more significant words for me than democracy and equality.8. It's difficult for me to control my desires.9. I use flattery to succeed.10. Sometimes my character is marked by passionate obsession, with occasional depressions or obsessive thoughts.11. Sometimes I quickly press something 'wrong' without thinking.12. I often try to guess the hidden motives behind other people's behavior and words.13. I have episodes of intense fear, anger, or sadness during which I feel an unpleasant smell around.14. I can instantly change my emotional states.15. If a family member is playing intrigue and tripping someone up for their career, I wouldn't condemn them.16. I avoid tasks that require prolonged mental effort (I dislike them or reluctantly start them).17. I frequently have mood swings.18. When lacking impressions and changes, I'm drawn to rash and hasty actions.19. I'm constantly concerned with looking better than I am.20. In conflict situations, compared to my usual state, I forget arguments and rely much more on pure emotions.21. In my free time, I prefer to socialize with people rather than doing something on my own.22. I often get disoriented and confused in my own thoughts.23. I try to delegate my duties to others whenever possible.24. The world of people, experiences, and feelings is much more interesting to me than the world of machines and natural laws.25. I often admire myself.26. I can skillfully 'play' with expressing my dissatisfaction to influence others.27. I devote little time and effort to my work.28. Sometimes I lie to succeed.29. Sometimes I seek suffering and self-sacrifice.30. My interest in scientific questions is rather superficial; in any case, I wouldn't choose a profession in this or a purely technical field.31. Choose the appropriate option number - IEI: The same feelings can dominate me for a long time, and then all facts will be subordinate to them. LII: Facts are always stable for me, and emotions are fleeting and transient.32. I have aggressive-impulsive traits.33. I easily change my decisions.34. I can maintain light flirting simultaneously with several people (or this used to be usual for me).35. I often had doubts about who I am.36. Feeling is more important to me than thought.37. Right or wrong, my country is my country, and therefore it's always right.38. Sometimes I find that in relationships with strong and aggressive people, I subconsciously enjoy playing a dependent role, being a bit capricious and provocative.39. If a man is not a warrior, then he is not a man.40. Any passion engulfs me completely.41. It's hard for me to manage a household economically; I often succumb to the temptation of buying beautiful things that are clearly beyond my budget.42. I am better than many at 'gaining trust' and deceiving someone with flattery.43. I add elements of light caprice, irony, elegance, and originality to any business.44. I am emotionally unstable and not very resilient.45. I like to draw attention to myself - be it through poetry or suffering.46. Sometimes it feels pleasant to experience subordination and humiliation.47. I love dining in restaurants or good cafes.48. In work, I poorly sense the boundaries of what is acceptable - that is, I don't know how much work and with what quality is needed to meet the required level.49. I like to learn what my friends really feel and need.50. Sometimes I like to hurt myself.51. I struggle to make the right decisions.52. I am excellent at catching the 'emotional vibrations' of another person.53. I am great at making excuses by talking excessively.54. I value strong and demanding, authoritarian people who can guide and control me.55. My emotions and experiences are very unstable, easily changing from negative to positive and vice versa.56. I often act impulsively and, as it turns out later, without fully thinking things through.57. I like people who are authoritative, assertive, and strong.58. When solving a common task, I focus on the perception of the other person rather than the task itself - it's very important to me what my partner feels, what they think about me, and whether they love me.59. I know how to ask for something I need and want.60. Sometimes I am interested in painful and humiliating experiences, feeling some 'thrill' from them.61. I am generally inconsistent; my mood and thoughts change often.62. I like to be capricious.63. I am not economical and capricious with money, willing to spend my last money on a sudden purchase 'for the soul.'64. I instantly feel who is the leader in a new company by small emotional nuances.65. I can sleep many hours and still not feel rested.66. I tend to have aggressive thoughts directed at myself.67. If something unusual happens to my experience, I immediately want to discuss it in a circle of close trusted people, to find out their opinion, and to know what to do.

Markers that LII mostly agrees with, while IEI mostly disagrees:

1. I solve any intellectual tasks faster than most of my acquaintances.2. I am always very meticulous when faced with something unclear.3. I change my opinion only when offered a position closer to objective truth and more logically argued.4. In any task, I use many criteria for comparison and verification.5. I am better than others at highlighting the main and essential in any topic, separating it from the details.6. I have encyclopedic knowledge; sometimes I act as a 'walking encyclopedia.'7. I always think first, then act.8. I am known for thorough proofs and detailed arguments.9. I solve any task not smoothly, but in stages - having made a decision, I always stick to it as a reached firm ground.10. I always strive for comprehensive analytical consideration of a subject or phenomenon to answer the questions: 'why?', 'what for?', 'for what purpose?'.11. I instantly notice small logical errors in others.12. It is typical for me to be a person of my word, valuing fairness and the reasonable order based on it.13. I would like to work in a bureau of standardization of measuring instruments.14. I love to sort everything out to better understand how the world works.15. I can't easily spend money, although some accuse me of stinginess - I just prefer to save something for a 'rainy day.'16. In communication, I often emphasize my ability to structure logical material better than others and get offended if this ability is contested.17. I am a broadly erudite person with a sharply analytical mind.18. When I read articles on the internet, I am always interested in the tables with numerical information.19. I would enjoy being a scientist-researcher in biology, physics, or mathematics.20. My logical chains in reasoning are always accurate and precise.21. In money matters, I always have 'strategic reserves' for special situations.22. Logic always helps me make the world clear and structured to guide further by general principles and ideas, ignoring details.23. I always find it easy to think.24. I would like to process sociological statistics, using mathematical methods to identify interconnections and trends in people's preferences.25. I am objective and sharp in judgments and principled evaluations; structures, classifications, concepts are my style.26. I find the main and general patterns in events faster than others.27. I strive to be more informed and competent than others, relying only on facts in conversation, loving clarity and precision in everything, and not forgiving unreliability.28. I enjoy painstaking scientific research and analytical work related to analyzing complex phenomena and objects.29. I like to invent complex tasks for myself that require comparing many facts.30. The ideal job for me is a programmer or any other that requires perseverance, logic, and imagination, using systems analysis, creating schemes and classifications, and generating concepts.31. My arguments are characterized by clarity and convincing evidence.32. Compared to others, I cannot submit work until everything is checked and I am convinced that everything is done exactly as needed.33. I live more by reason and calculation than by heart, and logic and order are my protection against bullies.34. I am a person who has 'found myself,' quite certain in my goals, aspirations, and values.35. I always clearly separate cause from effect, and I am a master at analyzing causal relationships, the primary and secondary in a chain of events.36. I have a strongly developed research instinct.37. Maybe I am a bore, but I usually look for scientific, not mystical explanations for everything unusual.38. I have a strong desire to know the deep laws and objective causes.39. I would make an excellent analyst, mathematician, programmer, or geologist.40. I am an independent and self-sufficient person.41. I keep many useful factual data in my head, so my quantitative assessments of objects or phenomena are usually more accurate than most other people's.42. I am known for rationalizing labor.43. I am always focused on objectivity and fairness, evaluating people based not on personal sympathies and not diplomacy, but only on their contribution to the common cause.44. I would like to work as a programmer, creating computer programs.45. I like to classify events and objects, comparing them by some feature.46. My reasoning is always consistent and based on facts, not emotions.47. I was very interested in formal-logical laws.48. When making decisions, I almost always soberly follow reason and scientific knowledge.49. I always weigh and assess any proposed action first.50. I evaluate both ideas and people as impartially as possible - without considering my personal likes or dislikes and social status.51. My arguments are characterized by persuasiveness and solidity.52. My storytelling is characterized by event sequence and continuity - mixing episodes from different moments in time, placing them side by side by some non-temporal criterion, is unusual for me.53. I like refining technologies, bringing them to maximum efficiency.54. I love rationalizing and making my work more convenient - this is where I primarily show my inventiveness.55. I have a tendency to critically recheck and clarify everything in any activity.56. I think people who cannot logically reason are almost monkeys.57. I love reading serious historical and journalistic books.58. Logic often helps me defend my rights against the encroachments of bullies.59. I am interested in the structure of the state and its electoral system.60. I find it difficult to get close to other people.61. I always logically calculate the situation and take precautions in advance to avoid troubles.62. In many respects, I am a strictly pedantic person.63. Most of the time, I have very high internal concentration.64. Key words for me: algorithm, program, dry analysis of facts.65. In any business, I always have reserves, keeping them ready to use when needed.66. The motto 'Science and Humanism' is closer to me than 'Unity and Cohesion.'67. I can fully focus attention only on the main information and problems, ignoring all insignificant things.